Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/45400
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDominguez, M.G.
dc.contributor.authorTroyo, R.
dc.contributor.authorVasquez, A.I.
dc.contributor.authorRamos, A.L.
dc.contributor.authorRivera, H.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-15T19:12:40Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-15T19:12:40Z-
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-17544404533&partnerID=40&md5=d392c5d2c3379d13afa5021ee612197d
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/45400-
dc.description.abstractWe studied in 39 carriers of 26 reciprocal translocations (including five de novo and seven of indeterminate occurrence) the metaphase localization of the derivative chromosomes, their normal non-homologous counterparts (here called A and B), and two control pairs (C and D). In eight familial translocations, we analysed two to five carriers. We digitally captured 10 G-banded lymphocyte metaphases per individual and measured in microns the largest diameter (d) of the metaphase and six intercentromeric distances: (1) der A?der B (problem distance 1, pd1), (2) der A?B (pd2), (3) der B?A (pd3), (4) A?B (control distance 1, cd1), (5) the smaller distance between C and D (cd2) and (6) the largest distance between C and D (cd3); in addition, the average between C and D (cd4) was calculated. We used the formula ? = 100(cd - pd)/d 12 times per metaphase, compared each pd vs. each cd, and tested the differences by the Wilcoxon matched-pair test. Although, in the whole sample there were not significant differences respect to cd1, this distance emerged as the proper control. In the eight familial translocations, the three pd vs. cd1 comparisons revealed that in 19/24 times the pd was smaller but only once reached significance (cd1 vs. pd2 in t[3;4]). In the analysis per individual the pd was smaller than cd1 in 19 (pd1), 22 (pd2) and 22 (pd3) cases although only twice reached significance. We conclude that in some translocations, the derivative chromosomes actually lie close from each other or from a normal non-homologous counterpart. � 2003 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyWOS
dc.titleTopology of constitutional reciprocal translocations in metaphase
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0003-3995(03)00033-9
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAnnales de Genetique
dc.relation.ispartofvolume47
dc.relation.ispartofissue1
dc.relation.ispartofpage85
dc.relation.ispartofpage93
dc.subject.keywordChromosomal domains in metaphase; Topology of reciprocal translocations
dc.contributor.affiliationDom�nguez, M.G., Divisi�n de Gen�tica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Apdo. Postal 1-3838, Guadalajara, Jalisco 44280, Mexico, Doctorado en Gen�tica Humana, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico; Troyo, R., Doctorado en Gen�tica Humana, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico; V�squez, A.I., Divisi�n de Gen�tica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Apdo. Postal 1-3838, Guadalajara, Jalisco 44280, Mexico; Ramos, A.L., Divisi�n de Gen�tica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Apdo. Postal 1-3838, Guadalajara, Jalisco 44280, Mexico; Rivera, H., Divisi�n de Gen�tica, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Apdo. Postal 1-3838, Guadalajara, Jalisco 44280, Mexico, Doctorado en Gen�tica Humana, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Appears in Collections:Producción científica UdeG

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in RIUdeG are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.